Today I've experimented a bit with using multi-threading in Linux to write LED status updates. On Linux, setting LEDs actually blocks the process - depending on the controller - for 30 ms up to 500 ms in some cases. I'm not yet sure if there is a way to make this faster (in Mac OS X on the same hardware, updating LEDs is no problem, but maybe OS X does not wait for an acknowledgement when sending out the set LEDs packet).
You can find the multi-threading branch in the multithreaded branch on Github. Now that we have the nice test_read_performance tool, we can compare the results with the previous results from the OS X installation (same hardware):
-- PS Move API Sensor Reading Performance Test --
Testing STATIC READ performance (non-changing LED setting)
1000 reads in 13043 ms = 76.669478 reads/sec (144x seq jump = 14.40 %)
1000 reads in 12563 ms = 79.598822 reads/sec (100x seq jump = 10.00 %)
1000 reads in 12451 ms = 80.314834 reads/sec (88x seq jump = 8.80 %)
=====
Mean over 3 rounds: 78.861043 reads/sec
Testing SMART READ performance (rate-limited LED setting)
1000 reads in 20073 ms = 49.818164 reads/sec (177x seq jump = 17.70 %)
1000 reads in 20113 ms = 49.719087 reads/sec (196x seq jump = 19.60 %)
1000 reads in 19858 ms = 50.357539 reads/sec (190x seq jump = 19.00 %)
=====
Mean over 3 rounds: 49.964930 reads/sec
Testing BAD READ performance (continous LED setting)
1000 reads in 26187 ms = 38.186887 reads/sec (310x seq jump = 31.00 %)
1000 reads in 25985 ms = 38.483741 reads/sec (306x seq jump = 30.60 %)
1000 reads in 26784 ms = 37.335723 reads/sec (343x seq jump = 34.30 %)
=====
Mean over 3 rounds: 38.002116 reads/sec
Testing RAW READ performance (no LED setting)
1000 reads in 12612 ms = 79.289565 reads/sec (101x seq jump = 10.10 %)
1000 reads in 12639 ms = 79.120184 reads/sec (109x seq jump = 10.90 %)
1000 reads in 12576 ms = 79.516539 reads/sec (107x seq jump = 10.70 %)
=====
Mean over 3 rounds: 79.308762 reads/sec
Still not as good as on OS X, but a good starting point. Without multi-threading on Linux, the results are much worse when the LEDs are updated often:
-- PS Move API Sensor Reading Performance Test --
Testing STATIC READ performance (non-changing LED setting)
1000 reads in 12890 ms = 77.579519 reads/sec (125x seq jump = 12.50 %)
1000 reads in 12660 ms = 78.988942 reads/sec (104x seq jump = 10.40 %)
1000 reads in 12650 ms = 79.051383 reads/sec (108x seq jump = 10.80 %)
=====
Mean over 3 rounds: 78.539948 reads/sec
Testing SMART READ performance (rate-limited LED setting)
1000 reads in 14596 ms = 68.511921 reads/sec (161x seq jump = 16.10 %)
1000 reads in 14315 ms = 69.856794 reads/sec (143x seq jump = 14.30 %)
1000 reads in 14224 ms = 70.303712 reads/sec (139x seq jump = 13.90 %)
=====
Mean over 3 rounds: 69.557475 reads/sec
Testing BAD READ performance (continous LED setting)
1000 reads in 41132 ms = 24.311971 reads/sec (69x seq jump = 6.90 %)
1000 reads in 41014 ms = 24.381918 reads/sec (70x seq jump = 7.00 %)
1000 reads in 41153 ms = 24.299565 reads/sec (76x seq jump = 7.60 %)
=====
Mean over 3 rounds: 24.331151 reads/sec
Testing RAW READ performance (no LED setting)
1000 reads in 12683 ms = 78.845699 reads/sec (114x seq jump = 11.40 %)
1000 reads in 12723 ms = 78.597815 reads/sec (114x seq jump = 11.40 %)
1000 reads in 12640 ms = 79.113924 reads/sec (107x seq jump = 10.70 %)
=====
Mean over 3 rounds: 78.852478 reads/sec
Interestingly, the multi-threaded variant is worse in the SMART READ test (the rate-limited LED update variant). Not sure why this is the case - maybe it's some threading overhead. For some of my older PS Move controllers that I have here, it's even worse - seems like some controllers are faster to respond than others. I wonder if there's a difference in the firmware or if it's different hardware (the faster controllers is the one that I bought more recently).
Keine Kommentare:
Kommentar veröffentlichen